"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
07/19/2016 at 16:56 • Filed to: None | 1 | 7 |
No? Ok, sorry to have wasted your time, this !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! is not for you. I’d ask NPoCP, but there’s no price listed. Safe to say, if you have to ask, you can’t afford it.
lone_liberal
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
07/19/2016 at 17:15 | 1 |
That’s kind of boring for a rock star’s Rolls.
Honeybunchesofgoats
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
07/19/2016 at 17:15 | 1 |
“Rock star”
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> lone_liberal
07/19/2016 at 17:16 | 0 |
This one allegedly belonged to Tom Jones, who is perhaps not as interesting as John Lennon.
Honeybunchesofgoats
> Honeybunchesofgoats
07/19/2016 at 17:19 | 1 |
Kinja decided that buttons don't work when editing my last comment.
lone_liberal
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
07/19/2016 at 17:22 | 1 |
Then again you can be a very interesting rock star and own plain Rollers. At least I think Keith Moon and Alice Cooper qualify as interesting.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> lone_liberal
07/19/2016 at 17:57 | 0 |
To say the least.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Honeybunchesofgoats
07/19/2016 at 18:00 | 0 |
I mean, he was kind of a rock star.